|
MLC Conference
Paper
CHRISTIAN EDUCATION IN THE
PHILIPPINES
Dr. Dennis Nordine
Baptist Theological
College
Prof Lydia Mapile
Asian Theological
Seminary
Ms. Gladys
Mangiduyos
Wesleyan
University-Philippines
Ptr. Jerson Narciso
Central Philippine
University
Mr. Robert Del
Rosario
International
School of Theology
Ms. Cora Navarra
Asian School of
Development and Cross-Cultural Studies
Prof. Anita T.
Leyson
Philippine
Christian University-Union Theological Seminary
Coordinator
Introduction
Christian
Education in the Philippines
dates back to its first colonizers, the Spanish conquistadores, who brought with
them in 1521 their political system that was closely intertwined with their
religion, an education that taught the Catholic doctrine, medical mission and
social services. It is worth mentioning that the oldest university established
in the country, the University of Sto. Tomas, is even older than the oldest
university in America.
Together with this were boys’ and girls’ schools like Letran, Colegio de San
Agustin, Sta. Isabel College, University of San Ignacio and University of San
Carlos, established by the different religious congregations like the
Dominicans, Recollects, the Daughters of Charity, the Jesuits, and many more.
When the
Americans came to the Philippines in 1898, the occupation had with it another
package of political, socio-cultural, economic, and welfare systems. If the
Spanish colonization was very strong in the role of religion, the American
regime was characterized by a stronger role of the government in almost all
spheres of societal endeavor. For the first time in the history of Philippine
colonization, public institutions were set up—be they in welfare or in
education. Government hospitals were established, foremost of which was the
Philippine General Hospital. The concept of public school saw its realization
opening education to every one with elementary education made mandatory. Higher
education during the period was purportedly aimed at the democratization of the
Philippines according to American patterns, with emphasis on self-government,
the propagation of the English language, the promotion of the dignity of labor,
and the initiation of mass education as the base of enlightened democracy. On
the other hand, Protestant American missionaries started to make a dent in their
evangelization efforts with the establishment of churches and bible schools. It
should be noted, however, that the Bible came to the Philippines as early as
1828 and 1853 as recorded by the American Bible Society and the British and
Foreign Bible Society respectively. However, the first account of its
distribution in the country, the Gospel of Luke translated into the Pangasinense
dialect, was in 1873. A few Filipinos also knew of some Catholic priests who
obtained and read the bible. As a matter of fact, Fr. Jacinto Zamora, one of the
Filipino martyrs executed by the Spanish government in1872, had given a copy of
the Gospel of Matthew to a young Filipino who later became a Protestant
evangelist. (Kwantes, 1998)
The first
Protestant school recorded in the history of American occupation in the country
was the Silliman University in
Dumaguete City. The school celebrated its 100th year in 2001 with its graduates
coming from all parts of the world. The University has its Divinity School and
prides itself of being a Christian University in that part of the country. Other
schools that were established by the American missionaries were the Central
Philippine University (1905) which started as a school for boys, and later
adding a school of theology (1929) under the Philippine Baptist Conference in
Iloilo City, the Union Theological Seminary (1907) in Dasmarinas, Cavite, now a
part of the Philippine Christian University (1946) that maintains two campuses,
one in Manila and another in Cavite, The PCU is run by two big churches—the
United Methodist Church and the United Church of Christ in the Philippines; the
Wesleyan College (1946), now a University, in Cabanatuan City in Nueva Ecija,
under the auspices of the UMC. Other Theological and Bible schools also came into being: the
Harris Memorial Training
School for women church workers, the FEBIAS College of Bible and the Ellinwood
Bible School.
Another seminary
that made a dent in the history of Christian Education in the Philippines was
the St. Andrews Seminary that was established in the 1930s under the Episcopal
Church in the Philippines. Secondary schools were also established bearing mark
of Protestant missionaries. Together with us in this conference are
representatives of other schools offering Christian Education as their main
program: the Asian Theological Seminary, an international and
interdenominational school established in 1969 and located in Quezon City; the
Baptist Theological College (1958) located in Cebu and which started with
a three-year training for pastor farmers; and, the International School of
Theology located in Novaliches, Quezon City.
What should
Christian Education be in the Tertiary Level?
Higher education
refers to the formal layer of education beyond secondary education. It includes
all colleges and universities offering baccalaureate and/or graduate degree
programs as well as institutions offering vocational, technical and technician
courses. These colleges and universities are-either public or private. The
public schools are established by law, administered, supervised and financially
supported by the government and are referred to as state universities or city
colleges. . Private schools are established in accordance with law, duly
authorized to operate educational courses by the Department, supported and
maintained principally through tuition and other student fees, and owned and
administered by a private person or a corporation. Private schools are further
subdivided into sectarian and non-sectarian. The sectarian schools are run by
religious organizations or denominations and offer a distinct type of Christian
education depending on the orientation of the religious group that is running
the institution. -
A University, or
any school for that matter, is an institution that is engaged in the formation
of the human being in the community. That, being its special function, the
school is especially equipped to help in the training of the human mind so that
the mind will pursue the truth and avoid falsehood, appreciate beauty, and learn
to delineate what is good and what is bad (Nacpil, 1998). The school also
develops the human person to acquire skills and find his place under the sun,
earn his living and contribute his own good to the community of which he is a
part.
Where, now, does Christian
education come in?
Every person who
has had the exposure in a Christian institution of learning believes in the
unifying philosophy of education, which regards all truth as one with God as its
author, no matter, that science would refute it. This philosophy is given flesh
as the school begins to acquaint students with God and His truth in all aspects
so as to effect in them a well-rounded growth fit for a useful life in the
community and the nation. The school, therefore, shall stand for high moral
principles, for service, and for the application of Christian teachings to all
human affairs.
From a
theological perspective, education means the liberation of humankind from sin to
have a free and fuller life. Christian Education derives its philosophy from the
imperatives of the Bible, that is, the human person was created in the image of
God (Genesis 1:26-27) endowed with inherent worth and dignity and tasked with
ruling and caring functions over all creations (Genesis 1:26-28; Ps.
8:4-8). Education should be governed by a realization of the worth and
sacredness of the human being, and as such, should aim at the full growth in
stature, in mind, body and spirit of each person (Camba, 1998).
The liberating
context of education should find itself in the following:
1) Freedom from
the imposition of other culture into The total educational process. Long years
of colonization resulted to the alienation of Filipinos from their own cultural
heritage. The Christian family is undergoing a lot of changes with long
treasured values being set-aside because of Western ideas, technological
advances, globalization, political, educational, and social revolution. The
medium of instruction, which is the English language, all the more influenced
the mind, trimming it down into what is beautiful in the English language.
2) The
marginalized sector of the population need to be liberated from their continuing
alienation from the normal stream of society. There is too much unequal
distribution of wealth and services.
If our Christian schools will be
true to their mission, then the curricula should be reflective of Jesus’
preferential love for the poor and powerless.
3) Freedom from
selfishness. Christian education should concern itself with the social realities
of our time. Webber (1998), as cited by Lydia Mapile in her dissertation,
defines social concern as the application of Christian worldview to the
political, legislative, economic, and moral life of society and individuals. It
actively promotes justice and morality, and speaks of five educational tasks,
namely, the act of representing of speaking on behalf of powerless or advocacy;
organizing communities that encourage and empower people; evangelism; worship;
and, service (Pazmino, 1994).
Following the
foregoing discussion, let us now sum up what Christian Education should be in
the academic community:
1. Christian
Education must aim toward total formation of the individual—both in his mental,
physical and spiritual being.
2.
Fully
cognizant of the person’s worth and dignity, Christian education must be
liberating. It should aim toward liberating the individual from all forms of
enslavement—poverty, ignorance, western influences that are inimical to the
preservation of his/her own culture.
3. Christian
education should aim at genuine service to the poor, the deprived and the
oppressed by being socially aware, concerned and responsible.
4.
Church-related schools, when their aim is definitely Christian, can be regarded
as a vital part of the program of church’s evangelistic outreach and at the same
time a valuable agency in the preparation of young people for responsible
citizenship:
Where are we-in the Implementation
of a Christian Education Program?
With the
foregoing as our framework, let us take a closer took at Christian Education in
our own schools. The Philippine delegation is composed of seven members—three
from Christian Universities1 three from Theological Schools, and one
from a School of Developmental
-and Cross-cultural Studies. Poring over the vision and mission statements of
these institutions, we see some commonalities and converging points. In summary,
the following highlight the uniqueness of each school.
1) Central
Philippine University—A university committed to exemplary Christian
education for life and responsive to the needs of the total person and the
world. Its philosophy of education is directed towards the search for truth for
the wholeness of life through the creative interaction between knowledge and
faith. Its commitment to the proclamation of the Good News finds itself in word
and deed through classroom instruction and research, effective Christian service
by its administrators and highly committed and competent personnel, Christian
ministry, evangelism and mission program and campus ministry as a major work of
the Chaplaincy office, University Church, Religious and Ethics
Department, Gospel Teams, school organizations, community outreach and
socio-cultural-environmental concerns, and the training of pastors. As a
Christian University, it is ecumenical in its perspective believing that there
can never be unity in doctrine but there can be unity in faith and love that
transcends the barriers of creed, culture, and race.
2)
Baptist Theological College—Its vision is the glorification of God by assisting churches - in
training leaders to minister in all areas where God calls them to minister. Its
Christian education curricula for its biblical and theological training are
designed to develop in its students the necessary knowledge, attitudes and
skills which are required for effective ministry and respond to the changing
cultural, social, spiritual environment in which the gospel -is to be carried
out. As an educational institution, it implements a program that strengthens the
Christian lives of its students through nurture; devotional life, exemplary
Christian modeling coupled by a core of spiritually and educationally excellent
faculty who are professionally trained, engaged in usable research and Christian
ministry.
3) Asian
Theological Seminary—The purpose of-the seminary is to glorify God by
providing quality theological education to prepare workers for God’s Church in
Asia. These workers include pastors, evangelists, bible teachers,,
cross-cultural missionaries, local lay leaders and leaders in para-church
ministries. Its theological education is grounded on the Scriptures that finds
relevance in facing the pressing issues of the day as its trained workers serve
as “salt and light” in this world. Its Christian education finds meaning in the
theme: “Committed to the Word, Caring for the World:” While it fosters the
highest standards of scholarship, it commits itself to mission and witness
through communication of God’s truth to all mankind, engaging in holistic
ministry to the needy and involvement in socio-political transformation,
maintaining a sense of community that goes beyond our shore. The offering of a
course in its curricula, which intertwines cross cultural studies and urban
ministries, prepares its students to respond to societal changes including the
current trend in urbanization.
4)
Wesleyan University of the
Philippines—It started as Philippine Wesleyan College, named after its founder,
John Wesley, a spiritual, methodical, and disciplined scholar who demonstrated
his faith by helping others. As an institution of learning, its vision for a
dynamic society finds meaning in its mission to achieve scholarship, selfless
service, and character. Its academic programs are geared toward training future
leaders based on the enabling and empowering principles and teachings of Jesus
Christ. With a collegial and democratic leadership, WU-P strives for excellence
in all levels of educational endeavor—from the preschool to the graduate
level—through a high standard of academic programs, quality instruction,
adequate facilities, research and a core of faculty that inculcates in their
students the capacity to integrate knowledge so that they will be resilient
enough to face the realities of this fast changing world. WU-P has also made a
dent in its service to the community through its outreach program and its
special education for the rehabilitation of the handicapped. A strong integrated
campus ministry and a school of theology further enhance its Christian
education, which is infused into its academic curricula. The Wesley Divinity
Seminary, which is located in the old Philippine Wesleyan College campus, trains
future workers of the local churches under the auspices of the United Methodist Church. -
5)
St. Andrew’s Seminary—The
seminary started as a catechetical school in the 1930’s in response to the great
need to train local church workers. Its first training school was put up in
Sagada, Mountain Province, with three students underwent tutorial classes in
Scriptures and church doctrine. The Seminary formally opened in 1947 in its
Quezon City campus joining three other institutions, Trinity College, St. Luke’s
Hospital and the Cathedral, all of which reflected the mission of the Episcopal
Church in the Philippines, namely, education, health care, spiritual nurture,
and theological education for ministry. The seminary training was integrated
with programs such as clinical pastoral education, urban industrial institute,
and the rural service program. These gave the students opportunities for social
and political involvement, interaction with their contemporaries in the Roman
Catholic and Protestant seminaries, and exposure to the realities of communities
and the streets, which were later, related to theology and the Scriptures.
Despite financial setbacks in the last decade, the Seminary, which underwent
some revisions in its Bachelor of Theology and Master of Divinity curricula, is
seeing signs of recovery. It takes pride in its institute of liturgy and music
and a Philippine-based ministry but without losing sight of its vocation in East
Asia and the Pacific.
6) Philippine
Christian University—Union Theological Seminary—Although the Union
Theological Seminary was established several years before the Philippine
Christian University, the merging of the two schools strengthened the vision of
PCU as a distinctively Christian University, integrating faith, character and
service, in building up and enhancing a quality of life. This somehow
complements the Seminary’s vision of an empowering and relevant spiritual
leadership for Christian mission and ministry through a learning process of
understanding, interpreting and articulating the transformative character of the
Christian faith, by being faithful to God’s call and responsive to people’s
context and needs. Both the university and the seminary strive for academic
excellence but fully grounded on the realities of the time and strong in their
ecumenical orientation fully recognizing that the role of the school is to
become a forum for the discussion of other religious tenets yet binding in the
subject of faith. They take pride in a philosophy of education that is Filipino
in character yet ecumenical in approach, strong in Christian value orientation
with the integration of Christian formation and Christian Ethics in the
curricula. Both have an active campus ministry, various student Christian
organizations, and a community outreach program reaching out to cultural and
urban communities.
7) Asian
School of Development and Cross-Cultural Studies (ASDECS)—ASDECS envisions
the creation of a mutually enabling environment that builds the capacities of
individuals and organizations in generating faith-based and experience-grounded
paradigms and fresh approaches to cross-cultural, tranformational development
practices that are rooted in the Asian context. It is committed to the
establishment of a training consortium specializing in both formal and
non-formal education in the field of development and cross-cultural studies
through courses that are integrative, practical and multi-disciplinary; a core
of experienced faculty from the academe and from the field with intensive
cross-cultural experience; formal courses for busy professionals who wish to
sharpen their skills in development and cross-cultural work; the empowerment of
grassroots communities by creating mobile teaching teams to deliver non-formal
training in rural and urban poor sites. Using a two-fold strategy of training
and research that integrates development, cross-cultural and missions studies,
ASDECS aims toward the formation of Christian professionals interested in doing
holistic mission in a way that is sensitive to both the social and cultural
context of Asian peoples. It utilizes a modular approach, on the job research,
and reflection sessions. It integrates holistic development and spiritual
perspectives in its training with the end in view of using these perspectives in
theory-building.
Let us look at
the common elements present in the foregoing Christian schools of learning.
1) Christian
education not only in the seminary but integrated into the curricula of their
academic programs. -
2) Campus
ministry that is inter-racial, inter-faith and socially relevant.
3) Ecumenical
orientation
4) Community
outreach program that is a true manifestation of the schools’ social concern.
5) Christian
education that is Asian in context and distinctively Filipino in orientation.
6) Core values
that include love of God and country, a sense of community, and service and
ministry to the needy.
7) A striving
toward academic excellence through a core of dedicated competent administration,
faculty, and staff relevant programs, instruction, and resources
8) A sense of
community where administration, faculty, staff and students form the locus of a
university’s aspiration.
In the final
analysis, there is the presence of Christian dimension in the universities, yet
some nagging questions need to be answered.
Issues/Problems Faced by Christian
Schools -
1. Can the
schools truly strike a balance between academic excellence and a strong and
distinct Christian outlook? In this time of rapid technological advances and
globalization, is not the school pressured into taking this as a priority in its
desire to produce academically equipped individuals and thus sacrifice the
Christian dimension in its curriculum?
2. How strong is
the Christian foundation of our schools in the Philippines to enable them to
open their doors to other races, creeds, religious orientations? How is unity in
diversity which is the essence-of ecumenism-best demonstrated without any fear
of losing one’s identity-?.To what extent has ecumenism permeated university
life?
3. Can a
-Christian university truly show its concern for the poor, deprived and
oppressed? Is the university willing and capable of investing part of its
resources since the need of-this sector of society is not merely spiritual but
also economic?
4. Is our campus
ministry true to its stated mission of being the light and the salt in the
campuses, making Christ alive and visible in the campus through the proclamation
of the Word, education, nurture, sharing and caring so that every individual and
the whole community may become living witnesses of God’s saving act in history?
That campus ministry is people and not religion; it is being and doing, an
exemplification of love and compassion for the helpless? That campus ministry is
inter-faith,. inter-racial, participatory, and socially relevant? Can campus
ministry unite learning and piety in ‘a Christian university?
5. If by
academic discipline to claim knowledge it would require the following criteria:
specific object of inquiry, method of inquiry, valid relationship to other
disciplines, yield results that can be established by scientific method, and has
a language of expression, would theology be able to meet the same criteria
considering that God which is the object of theology does not appear as a
phenomenon, He cannot be verified, He is not the result of an inquiry, no
relationship with other disciplines, and has no meaningful language? Then, would
this not negate after all what we have been talking about in terms of fusing
academic learning and Christian perspective?
Conclusions and Recommendations
The Christian
perspective is essential in the making of a genuine institution of learning
despite the continuing debate on whether or not there can be a convergence
between the tenets of Christianity and the academic elements of a university,
the search for knowledge and truth that can only be done by a method of inquiry.
The formation of the human mind requires a curriculum that is not merely
empirical, contingent and relative, but one that is humanizing. The curriculum
must aim at the development of the human being fully cognizant of his/her worth
and dignity as enunciated in the Scriptures. The academic curriculum must expose
the person to the realities of the world giving his/her the option to respond to
them magnifying therefore the liberating perspective of theology and ministry.
With this conclusion, we would like to recommend the following:
1. The
development of comprehensive academic curricula that balances between truth as a
requirement of the academic disciplines, and truth as seen from a Christian
perspective.
2. The promotion
of a strong ecumenical program where the university serves as a forum for the
exchange of ideas about the Christian faith in relation to other beliefs, for
inter-religious dialogue. We need to see the Holy Spirit working through the
diversity of the human experience. . . to embrace a vision of the future of the
church as reconciled diversity. (Richard Wood, quoting Bishop Walter Cardinal
Kaspar, in his speech as President of the United Board for Christian Higher
Education, December 2001). The true meaning of ecumenism should be imbibed and
practiced not only by administrators, faculty and staff, but also the students.
3. Strengthening
of the Chaplaincy through a more active relevant campus ministry.
4. Strengthening
the service orientation of the schools with the preferential option for the
poor, the voiceless, the oppressed.
5. Continuous
training of faculty, administrators and staff of the university not only
academically but exposure to Asian social realities, the rapid changes in the
Filipino family, reorientation to Christian education so that they may be able
to do their tasks in the context of being Filipino, Asian, and being Christian.
Addendum to the
Philippine Report
International School of Theology —
Asia
ISOT is an
interdenominational school of theology with a vision for the Church of Asia to
be supplied with godly, reproducing servant leaders who would help spearhead a
movement of God to fulfill the Great Commission of Christ in Asia and the world.
The school tries to attain this vision by committing itself to the formation of
servant leaders who have a passion for God and who possess the biblical
knowledge, Christ-like character, and practical skills needed to help the Asian
church fulfill the Great Commission in this generation.
Experiences in
the formation of Church leaders were very encouraging although the school is not
spared from some problems. It is to the credit of the school that it has in its
faculty a group of dedicated and committed individuals who continue to serve and
train students for the ministry despite its inability to pay their salary.
Another strength of the school is its challenging classes due to the diversity
of its students adopting therefore a curriculum that responds to the realities
of the various cultures and religions. The formation of the Church leaders
follows a two-pronged strategy—classroom instruction and a strong student
discipleship program. This discipleship program includes an outreach program
where both students and faculty go out to do practical field ministry, giving
leadership training, conducting house-to-house evangelism, and seminars in
various environs.
ISOT
faces the challenge of having to uphold academic standards vis-à-vis its mission
to develop future leaders who will be ministering in their own native language.
Another constraint is financial since its faculty is responsible for their own
support in order to be able to continue teaching without having to be burdened
by the financial incapability of the school. Despite all these problems,
however, ISOT continues to bear witness as a true school of God.
|